s8592 e7449 stenoparib selleckchem (Selleck Chemicals)
Structured Review

S8592 E7449 Stenoparib Selleckchem, supplied by Selleck Chemicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 9 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/s8592 e7449 stenoparib selleckchem/product/Selleck Chemicals
Average 92 stars, based on 9 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "A unified mechanism for PARP inhibitor-induced PARP1 chromatin retention at DNA damage sites in living cells."
Article Title: A unified mechanism for PARP inhibitor-induced PARP1 chromatin retention at DNA damage sites in living cells.
Journal: Cell reports
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114234
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 2. Kinetics of PARP1 at DNA damage sites upon PARPi (A–G) Normalized kinetics of PARP1 recruitment and removal at IR-induced DNA damage sites following treatment with (A) pamiparib, (B) veliparib, (C) olaparib, (D) rucaparib, (E) E7449, (F) niraparib, or (G) talazoparib. Boxplots depict half-times of PARP1 removal from DNA damage sites estimated via CRC modeling. Red dots indicate the mean value. (H) PRC values calculated based on the mean half-times of PARP1 removal from DNA damage sites. Error bars represent the SD. NT, no treatment; n.d., not determined. See also Figure S2.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 3. Exchange rates of PARP1 at DNA damage sites upon PARPi (A–G) NormalizedexchangeratesofPARP1 atIR-inducedDNA damage sites following treatmentwith(A) pamiparib,(B) veliparib, (C)olaparib, (D)rucaparib, (E) E7449, (F) niraparib, or (G) talazoparib. Boxplots depict the FRAP half-times of PARP1 DNA repair foci estimated via FRAP modeling. Red dots indicate the mean value. (H) PTC values calculated based on the mean FRAP half-times of PARP1 repair foci. Error bars represent the SD. NT, no treatment; n.d., not determined. See also Figures S3 and S6.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 4. Kinetics of ARH3 at DNA damage sites upon PARPi (A–G) Kinetics of recruitment and removal of ARH3 at IR-induced DNA damage sites following treatment with (A) pamiparib, (B) veliparib, (C) olaparib, (D) rucaparib, (E) E7449, (F) niraparib, or (G) talazoparib. Boxplots depict the maximum total fluorescence intensity of ARH3 at DNA damage sites estimated via CRC modeling. Red dots indicate the mean value. (H) PIC values calculated based on the mean maximum fluorescence intensity of ARH3 at DNA damage sites. (I) PARP1 residual activities and in vivo IC50 values. Error bars represent the SD. NT, no treatment; CI, confidence interval; n.d., not determined. See also Fig- ure S4.
Techniques Used: In Vivo
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 6. PARPis rearrange downstream DNA repair events (A) Correlations between the average half-times of recruitment of RFC4, PCNA, POLD2, and POLH following PARPi and PRC values for evaluated PARPis. Error bars represent the SD. (B) Correlation between the extent of uncoupling of PCNA removal and RPA1 recruitment and PRC values for evaluated PARPis. The uncoupling is calculated as the average difference between the half-times of removal of PCNA and the half-times of recruitment of RPA1 at the single-cell level. Ruca- and niraparib have been removed from the correlation graph on the right as outliers. Error bars represent the SD. (C) Clonogenic assay of HeLa Kyoto cells treated with the indicated PARPi concentrations. (D) Mean surviving fractions ± SEM of HeLa Kyoto cells treated with the indicated PARPi concentrations (n = 3). (E) Cell viability IC50 values (half-maximal suppression of cell viability). Error bars represent the SEM. White dots indicate the mean value. P, pamiparib; V, ve- liparib; O, olaparib; R, rucaparib; E, E7449; N, niraparib; T, talazoparib; n.d., not determined. See also Figure S7.
Techniques Used: Clonogenic Assay
![Melphalan reduces viability and induces apoptosis of HPV16 positive tonsillar cancer cells. ( a ) MTT assay on HN26 cells incubated for 24 h with 100 μM of the indicated cancer drugs or carrier substance DMSO. Mean values of triplicates are shown. ( b ) Viability of C33A2 cervical cancer cells, HN7 head and neck cancer cells or HN26 tonsillar cancer cells treated with DMSO or 100 μM melphalan for the indicated time periods was determined with an MTT assay as described in Materials and Methods and plotted against time in melphalan. ( c – e ) Western blots of full length and cleaved poly [ADP‐ribose] polymerase <t>(PARP1)</t> in extracts from HN26 cells, HN7 cells or1 C33A2 cells treated with 100 μM melphalan for the indicated time periods. Poly ADP‐ribosylation (parylation) was monitored by Western blotting with monospecific antibody to poly (ADP‐ribose) (PAR) in cell extracts from HN26 cells ( f ) or C33A2 cells ( h ) treated with 100 μM melphalan for the indicated time periods. ( g ) Western blotting with monospecific antibody to poly (ADP‐ribose) (PAR) in HN26 cells treated with 100 μM melphalan in the absence or presence of PARP1 inhibitor A‐966492. ( i ) Apoptosis‐mediated release of mitochondrial cytochrome c into the cytoplasmic space as a marker for apoptosis in HN26 cells treated with 100 μM melphalan for the indicated time points. Method is described in Supporting Information methods. Antibody is listed in Supporting Information Table . D, DMSO.](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_7446/pmc06587446/pmc06587446__IJC-144-297-g001.jpg)